<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I love motionbox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottmebberson.com/2009/04/28/i-love-motionbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottmebberson.com/2009/04/28/i-love-motionbox/</link>
	<description>Web Technologist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:59:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerry"Goose"Gossel</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottmebberson.com/2009/04/28/i-love-motionbox/#comment-1667</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry"Goose"Gossel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottmebberson.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-1667</guid>
		<description>Motinbox.com is just what I needed because I Video auto racing and they run longer then the 10 min. limit. I also used Smugmug to upload a 9 min. and it took at least 7 Hours! I don&#039;t have to change the video just click up load and it gets posted on my Site. Now I will learn to edit and put my clips togather.
Thanks Motionbox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motinbox.com is just what I needed because I Video auto racing and they run longer then the 10 min. limit. I also used Smugmug to upload a 9 min. and it took at least 7 Hours! I don&#8217;t have to change the video just click up load and it gets posted on my Site. Now I will learn to edit and put my clips togather.<br />
Thanks Motionbox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottmebberson.com/2009/04/28/i-love-motionbox/#comment-1546</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 01:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottmebberson.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-1546</guid>
		<description>MotionBox is pretty nice, but they DO still need to work on their interface a bit.  The organizational tools are a bit lacking (rearranging videos etc) and all around the UI feels &#039;rough&#039;.  The ability to handle M2TS files is great, but I look forward to a refreshed user interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MotionBox is pretty nice, but they DO still need to work on their interface a bit.  The organizational tools are a bit lacking (rearranging videos etc) and all around the UI feels &#8216;rough&#8217;.  The ability to handle M2TS files is great, but I look forward to a refreshed user interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k9sound</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottmebberson.com/2009/04/28/i-love-motionbox/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>k9sound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottmebberson.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>I just procured a Premium membership after trying the other sites and I&#039;m definitely sold on the Motionbox concept. Native MTS is sweet: plug in the card, hit upload, then come back later and it&#039;s a done deal! Motionbox told me more editing features in the mixer are forthcoming. Although I love Final Cut Pro, with AVCHD I have to babysit the process: upload, transcode, edit, render, post, etc., and I&#039;ll still go that route for serious, more creative edits. But for quick out-of-the-camera shoots, I save a lot of time with Motionbox and the resulting videos are awesome: clear, clean and proper ratio. Mbox is good for travel, too, with unlimited storage. All this for $30 a year. Huh? Get outta here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just procured a Premium membership after trying the other sites and I&#8217;m definitely sold on the Motionbox concept. Native MTS is sweet: plug in the card, hit upload, then come back later and it&#8217;s a done deal! Motionbox told me more editing features in the mixer are forthcoming. Although I love Final Cut Pro, with AVCHD I have to babysit the process: upload, transcode, edit, render, post, etc., and I&#8217;ll still go that route for serious, more creative edits. But for quick out-of-the-camera shoots, I save a lot of time with Motionbox and the resulting videos are awesome: clear, clean and proper ratio. Mbox is good for travel, too, with unlimited storage. All this for $30 a year. Huh? Get outta here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brindefalk</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottmebberson.com/2009/04/28/i-love-motionbox/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>brindefalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottmebberson.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>I agree! Really love the options and possibilities that Motionbox offers. I wrote a post about it at: http://brindefalk.org/2009/01/07/motionbox-a-neat-way-to-publish-videos/ 

Regards

Thomas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree! Really love the options and possibilities that Motionbox offers. I wrote a post about it at: <a href="http://brindefalk.org/2009/01/07/motionbox-a-neat-way-to-publish-videos/" rel="nofollow">http://brindefalk.org/2009/01/07/motionbox-a-neat-way-to-publish-videos/</a> </p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Thomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
